This idea has been merged into another idea. To comment or vote on this idea, please visit MVPM-I-198 Sort numbers as numbers in the registers.
When I try to sort RFI's by RFI number it sorts them 1, 10, 11, 12, 13....2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. It should sort them numerically.
Guest
| Company | Dondlinger |
| Job Title / Role | Project manager |
| I need it... | 1 month |
Dear Viewpoint Suggestion Box contributor;
We at Viewpoint sincerely thank you for your contribution to Suggestion Box on how we can improve Viewpoint products. While we can’t do everything at once, we rely upon your feedback to help guide the prioritization of our product improvements, and Suggestion Box is a critical tool for us to understand and prioritize our customers’ needs.
Viewpoint reviews Suggestion Box regularly for all of our products and updates statuses, adds comments, and performs various house-keeping (including deleting) as needed to ensure that Suggestion Box is maintained as a productive environment for product enhancements requests.
© 2023 Trimble Inc. All Rights Reserved. Viewpoint®, Vista™, Spectrum®, ProContractor™, Jobpac Connect™, Viewpoint Team™, Viewpoint Analytics™, Viewpoint Field View™, Viewpoint Estimating™, Viewpoint For Projects™, Viewpoint HR Management™, Viewpoint Field Management™, Viewpoint Financial Controls™, Vista Field Service™, Spectrum Service Tech™, ViewpointOne™, ProjectSight® and Trimble Construction One™ are trademarks or registered trademarks of Trimble Inc. or its affiliates in the United States and other countries. Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
@jim you can renumber RFIs once they have been created. It is a bit of a manual process, but use the "pencil" and enter the new number. Let me know if you have any questions.
As for a more permanent solution -- this is on our radar and we'll update this idea when we get this closer to development.
Attachments Open full size
Jim,
Sorry for my poorly worded response this morning. Is there a way to fix the RFI numbering issue once a project is underway or is it something that has to happen with the first RFI?
Attachments Open full size
Jim, I can assure you that it isn't a simple programming error. The field itself is a text field that may contain numbers, and if so, then it needs to be treated numerically and sorted by its numeric representation rather than ASCII. The difficulty is ensuring proper performance when this dynamic sorting is needed. We haven't lost sight of this. In the meantime the best workaround is to number RFI with one of two leading zeros'.
Attachments Open full size
Very disappointed that Viewpoint issued an update that include lots of window dressing but didn't address a simple, programming error.
Attachments Open full size
Viewpoint - Have the first RFI auto-populate as #001. Should solve the whole issue.
Thanks
Attachments Open full size
Try sorting by RFI number and by type in a filter. That will sort them numerically instead of alphanumeric. Not sure why the filter works but give it a try.
Attachments Open full size
Noted, and the same idea/feedback recorded in MVPM-I-198.
Attachments Open full size