Public Agencies often must use their specific form and force the contractors to do the same. If the form must be completed outside of TEAM and then uploaded as a second document, it kind of defeats the purpose of TEAM. See attached example of the type of form needed with the SF Port. They have a different form for RFIs and Submittals, which both must be used. Without the ability to incorporate their form, the Port team will not participate in TEAM, making the product a lot less useful for us.
Lane Grover
| Company | Gordon N. Ball, Inc. |
| Job Title / Role | Project Manager |
| I need it... | Yesterday...Come on already |
Dear Viewpoint Suggestion Box contributor;
We at Viewpoint sincerely thank you for your contribution to Suggestion Box on how we can improve Viewpoint products. While we can’t do everything at once, we rely upon your feedback to help guide the prioritization of our product improvements, and Suggestion Box is a critical tool for us to understand and prioritize our customers’ needs.
Viewpoint reviews Suggestion Box regularly for all of our products and updates statuses, adds comments, and performs various house-keeping (including deleting) as needed to ensure that Suggestion Box is maintained as a productive environment for product enhancements requests.
© 2023 Trimble Inc. All Rights Reserved. Viewpoint®, Vista™, Spectrum®, ProContractor™, Jobpac Connect™, Viewpoint Team™, Viewpoint Analytics™, Viewpoint Field View™, Viewpoint Estimating™, Viewpoint For Projects™, Viewpoint HR Management™, Viewpoint Field Management™, Viewpoint Financial Controls™, Vista Field Service™, Spectrum Service Tech™, ViewpointOne™, ProjectSight® and Trimble Construction One™ are trademarks or registered trademarks of Trimble Inc. or its affiliates in the United States and other countries. Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
When will this be implemented?
Custom Cover Sheets need to be implemented ASAP.
Just like Vista, we have multiple options to choose from (1 cover sheet to request from subs/suppliers, 1 cover sheet when its being submitted for review & 1 cover sheet when we, the general contractor, are sending it back as final approval to the sub/suppler).
The 1 cover sheet Team offers does NOT fit the needs. There is no customization that will cover all 3 needs in 1 document.
There should be a cover sheet available at each stage of the submittal process.
Currently, there is zero documentation available to customize a coversheet going back to the sub/supplier, showing documentation of the approval, date it went back and who it was going to. There are major improvements needed ASAP.
Yes!
Makes no sense to me to have to save a template cover sheet and have to download the package/submittal from Team once received so that the cover sheet attaches and then reupload the document again. Team needs to allow quick access to attach within the program so GC and stamp reviewed before sending for arch approval. Way to inefficient!
I submitted a similar comment just now. This is in the "planning to implement" section, but was posted in 2018. When will this be shipped?