We have Submittals where we need to require an Engineer's approval before the Architect approves it. As it stands now, when we send it for review, but the architect and engineer get notifications that it's in their court. We try to tell the architects to wait until the additional approvers are finished, but it relies on their discipline not to jump the gun and move it the approved state before then engineer's had a chance to look at it.
Eric Elfner
| Company | CG Schmidt, Inc. |
| Job Title / Role | CG Schmidt, Inc. |
| I need it... | Yesterday...Come on already |
Dear Viewpoint Suggestion Box contributor;
We at Viewpoint sincerely thank you for your contribution to Suggestion Box on how we can improve Viewpoint products. While we can’t do everything at once, we rely upon your feedback to help guide the prioritization of our product improvements, and Suggestion Box is a critical tool for us to understand and prioritize our customers’ needs.
Viewpoint reviews Suggestion Box regularly for all of our products and updates statuses, adds comments, and performs various house-keeping (including deleting) as needed to ensure that Suggestion Box is maintained as a productive environment for product enhancements requests.
© 2023 Trimble Inc. All Rights Reserved. Viewpoint®, Vista™, Spectrum®, ProContractor™, Jobpac Connect™, Viewpoint Team™, Viewpoint Analytics™, Viewpoint Field View™, Viewpoint Estimating™, Viewpoint For Projects™, Viewpoint HR Management™, Viewpoint Field Management™, Viewpoint Financial Controls™, Vista Field Service™, Spectrum Service Tech™, ViewpointOne™, ProjectSight® and Trimble Construction One™ are trademarks or registered trademarks of Trimble Inc. or its affiliates in the United States and other countries. Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
Glad to see this is likely, but when? This is important. Sequential approval would be great, but giving us a required so the Submittal can't move to the next state until all the required approvers have approved seems like a quick way to move toward that. Thanks.
Attachments Open full size
See suggestion VPT-I-33 as well. Giving us a workflow to route approvers in the proper order (see sequence used in HQ Reviewer Groups in Vista) and the ability to make those approvers required would be huge. Thanks.
Attachments Open full size
Here's an idea on how to architect this. Give us a checkbox for each additional approver that makes them required if checked. When the Primary Approver goes do approve it, do a check to make sure any required approvers have approved it (whatever trigger puts the green checkbox in front of their name when they've approved.) If all required approvers are not checked, do not allow the primary approver to Approve it. Some message about "Cannot Final approve until all required add'l approvers are complete." Thanks!
Attachments Open full size