Submit Your Suggestions for Viewpoint Team

 

Merged Suggestion

This idea has been merged into another idea. To comment or vote on this idea, please visit MVPM-I-304 Need Customizable Security Groups or Add More.

Permissions need to be more granular Merged

Allow Collaborators to have the ability to read/write in Submittals / RFI's but read only rights on certain Docs. We have also heard limit other permissions in Docs. The story sounds like doc folder security should not inherit Contact permissions but maybe have check boxes for:
- Read only access
- May upload documents
- May create revisions

  • Guest
  • Jun 2 2017
  • Planning to implement
Company Viewpoint
Job Title / Role SE
I need it... 6 months
  • Deleted User commented
    November 30, 2017 17:02

    If we allowed you to keep the current concept of the three roles (editor, collaborator, reviewer) and apply them to individual folders, would that solve your need? 

    So rather than assuming your access to a folder based on your project-level access, we'd allow you to choose the access for users by folder as you added them to it?  


  • Bobby Asbury commented
    November 19, 2017 00:09

    We use Sharefile (looking to get away from it once TEAM progresses to the point we can drop Sharefile) and typically most folders are read only and we set upload folders for Vendors to allow file transfers. Usually I set a folder for each Project Firm so as to keep privacy from other Firms. We are awaiting this function in TEAM

  • Guest commented
    August 24, 2017 15:45

    This type of permissions already exists in most file sharing platforms.  If you look at sharefile's system you will see exactly how this should function.

  • Guest commented
    June 12, 2017 14:57

    What I was hearing was by user by folder. So you may want read only on Drawings/specs or other "boiler plate" types docs while opening up rights on doc folders like commissioning, handover. Could it be by organization, maybe. I suggest getting some targeted feedback in this area from multiple interested customers / prospects so like you say "we don't over complicate it.."

  • Deleted User commented
    June 12, 2017 14:44

    How would users want to manage who has these permissions?   Agree we need more granular, I just want to be cautious that we don't make it too complicated to manage, its a slippery slope.   Would this be by individual user?  By organization?  Some other grouping mechanism?

Dear Viewpoint Suggestion Box contributor;

We at Viewpoint sincerely thank you for your contribution to Suggestion Box on how we can improve Viewpoint products. While we can’t do everything at once, we rely upon your feedback to help guide the prioritization of our product improvements, and Suggestion Box is a critical tool for us to understand and prioritize our customers’ needs. Viewpoint reviews Suggestion Box regularly for all of our products and updates statuses, adds comments, and performs various house-keeping (including deleting) as needed to ensure that Suggestion Box is maintained as a productive environment for product enhancements requests.

1515 SE Water Avenue, Suite 300, Portland, OR 97214 |  800.333.3197  | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy | Support Policies

© 2023 Trimble Inc. All Rights Reserved. Viewpoint®, Vista™, Spectrum®, ProContractor™, Jobpac Connect™, Viewpoint Team™, Viewpoint Analytics™, Viewpoint Field View™, Viewpoint Estimating™, Viewpoint For Projects™, Viewpoint HR Management™, Viewpoint Field Management™, Viewpoint Financial Controls™, Vista Field Service™, Spectrum Service Tech™, ViewpointOne™, ProjectSight® and Trimble Construction One™ are trademarks or registered trademarks of Trimble Inc. or its affiliates in the United States and other countries. Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.