When approving/reviewing a submittal an approver currently assigns a status code. When the submittal gets to the next step to be Released (or Close & Notify), that user has the ability to assign a status code as well. This is redundant and creates room for error. The Approver's status is the one that counts - if the releaser selects a different status code they have now sent the wrong message, and if they don't select a status code the email notification does not include the Approver's status. After the Approver selects a status the following step needs to pre-fill the Approver's status and make it read-only
Sam Schwartz
| Company | Viewpoint |
Dear Viewpoint Suggestion Box contributor;
We at Viewpoint sincerely thank you for your contribution to Suggestion Box on how we can improve Viewpoint products. While we can’t do everything at once, we rely upon your feedback to help guide the prioritization of our product improvements, and Suggestion Box is a critical tool for us to understand and prioritize our customers’ needs.
Viewpoint reviews Suggestion Box regularly for all of our products and updates statuses, adds comments, and performs various house-keeping (including deleting) as needed to ensure that Suggestion Box is maintained as a productive environment for product enhancements requests.
© 2023 Trimble Inc. All Rights Reserved. Viewpoint®, Vista™, Spectrum®, ProContractor™, Jobpac Connect™, Viewpoint Team™, Viewpoint Analytics™, Viewpoint Field View™, Viewpoint Estimating™, Viewpoint For Projects™, Viewpoint HR Management™, Viewpoint Field Management™, Viewpoint Financial Controls™, Vista Field Service™, Spectrum Service Tech™, ViewpointOne™, ProjectSight® and Trimble Construction One™ are trademarks or registered trademarks of Trimble Inc. or its affiliates in the United States and other countries. Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
Instead of just "Closed"
I agree Sam. Would also be helpfully if this status code showed up on sbmtl page