In our testing if an Issue was assigned to a user and then Marked Complete, it still shows up in the short Items Assigned to Me list on the user's dashboard.
It's our understanding this list should be a list of items with next actions required, thus, if an Issue is marked complete, and no further action is required, it should fall off this list.
Guest
| Company | Sellen |
| Job Title / Role | Construction Applications Manager |
| I need it... | 3 months |
Dear Viewpoint Suggestion Box contributor;
We at Viewpoint sincerely thank you for your contribution to Suggestion Box on how we can improve Viewpoint products. While we can’t do everything at once, we rely upon your feedback to help guide the prioritization of our product improvements, and Suggestion Box is a critical tool for us to understand and prioritize our customers’ needs.
Viewpoint reviews Suggestion Box regularly for all of our products and updates statuses, adds comments, and performs various house-keeping (including deleting) as needed to ensure that Suggestion Box is maintained as a productive environment for product enhancements requests.
© 2023 Trimble Inc. All Rights Reserved. Viewpoint®, Vista™, Spectrum®, ProContractor™, Jobpac Connect™, Viewpoint Team™, Viewpoint Analytics™, Viewpoint Field View™, Viewpoint Estimating™, Viewpoint For Projects™, Viewpoint HR Management™, Viewpoint Field Management™, Viewpoint Financial Controls™, Vista Field Service™, Spectrum Service Tech™, ViewpointOne™, ProjectSight® and Trimble Construction One™ are trademarks or registered trademarks of Trimble Inc. or its affiliates in the United States and other countries. Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
I think this was a bug. It's working as I expect it to now. (Although the change states options are the same as the RFI states, not Issue states. . .)
We don't necessarily "Assign" issues to a person, we use it to track things we need to disseminate for information where there may be cost or schedule impacts.This may be an ASI or Bulletin or change directive from the architect that we wouldn't assign to a single person but instead cc a number of people (insert plug for distro lists).
BUT if i was to assign it to some one person, having them mark it complete and then allowing the PM to decide if it was truly complete and the mark it closed, makes total sense.
Attachments Open full size
With Issues, "Completed" is actually a different state than "Closed". If the Assigned To person on an Issue is a Collaborator-type role, they won't be able to "Mark Complete & Close" - only "Mark Complete", which assigns the issue back to the Responsible Party to review.
The idea is a subcontractor would be assigned an issue to fix, then their fix should be reviewed by the GC before the Issue is closed out. Do you think there's a different word than "Complete" that makes more sense here?
Attachments Open full size